
The British Retail Consortium (BRC) is an umbrella association for a significant number of distributors in Great Britain. In response to the needs of the industry, the BRC developed the BRC Food Technical Standard in 1998. This standard is intended to be used for evaluating the food processing plants in order to assist the distributors and owners of food brands in their efforts to comply with the new European regulatory framework concerning the health safety of foods. As mentioned in the first part of this chapter, in keeping with Regulation (EC) 178/2002, distributors and food brands are obligated to respect the principle of due diligence. This means that they must be able to demonstrate that all precautions for preventing noncompliance with health safety have been taken in order not to be held liable under law. Despite its British origin, this PVS is now used in more than 100 countries throughout the world. The BRC Food Technical Standard is a so-called “B-to-B (business-to-business) PVS, in other words not accompanied by a label on the final product destined for the consumer. Compliance with this PVS must be verified by a third party accredited as an official certification body and respecting the BRC rules for auditing. Hence the BRC does Chapter 3 not audit businesses itself, but is the owner of the PVS and manager of the certification process. The BRC Food Technical Standard is therefore intended for processors of food products, enabling them to attest to their Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and the quality management systems that they have implemented in order to ensure that the products that they sell fulfil the requirements of both their customers and the regulatory framework in effect. This PVS is thus applicable to any plant that processes or packages food products. The standard has 7 chapters :
The costs for certification will depend (as is often the case) on the size of the site and on which systems have already been implemented in the business. It may turn out, for example, that the business must invest in order to upgrade its site, or that it may have to resort to outside expertise for documenting its procedures in preparation for an audit. BRC obviously has no control over these costs, nor over the auditing fees charged by the certification bodies.